Since
retired Major David Grusch last year accused the Department of Defense
of hiding ships and bodies of non-terrestrial intelligence, a lot of
water has passed under the bridge and many things have happened. In the
meantime, the authenticity of the controversial Nazca mummies presented
by the Mexican journalist Maussan has been established, and Colonel Carl
Nell confirmed at SALT in New York what David Grusch declared last
year, namely that it is not a secret in military circles that the Earth
is an object of interest by non-human beings. Furthermore, Harvard
University has recently declared that on Earth man has coexisted with
crypto-terrestrial beings since time immemorial (which therefore in turn
confirms the so-called Nazca mummies). So now the limit is full, and
the next president of the USA will necessarily have to deal with these
burning topics.
Talk
of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs) or UFOs has steadily evolved
from fringe conspiracy theories to a legitimate national security
concern. This change in perception has been mirrored by a growing public
demand for transparency and disclosure of relevant government
documents. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the question of
whether candidates will commit to releasing these documents has become a
hot topic of discussion. The stakes are high, as the next president’s
stance on UAP disclosure could significantly affect government
transparency policies and public trust.
Candidates' position on UAPs in the 2024 elections
Recent
social media campaigns have sought to place UAP disclosure at the
forefront of the agendas of 2024 presidential candidates. These
campaigns argue that candidates, regardless of their political
affiliation, should openly engage in the declassification of UFO-related
documents . This call to action highlights a broader desire for honesty
and openness within the federal government, urging candidates to
prioritize transparency in their policy proposals.
Public request for disclosure of UFO documents
There
is a growing consensus among the American public on the need to lift
the veil of secrecy surrounding the UAP documents. This call for
declassification is not driven simply by curiosity but by a genuine
concern for national security and government accountability. The public
seeks factual information about UAPs to better understand potential
threats and foster an environment of trust between the government and
its citizens.
Historical stigma and its impact on whistleblowers
The
stigma surrounding UFOs has long dissuaded whistleblowers from
providing information. Prominent figures, such as Bob Lazar, were
discredited and faced professional exile for their claims regarding
government knowledge of extraterrestrial technology. This historical
context highlights the need for cultural and procedural change within
government agencies, fostering an atmosphere in which discussion of UAPs
is not ridiculed but encouraged for the sake of transparency.
Bipartisan Congressional Efforts for Transparency
In
an era marked by divisive politics, UAP disclosure represents a rare
bipartisan issue. Initiatives such as the proposed UFO disclosure law
demonstrate both parties' commitment to revealing the truth. These
legislative efforts highlight the growing consensus that understanding
and recognizing the existence of UAPs is crucial to national security
and scientific progress.
Impact of teasing in political debates
The
trivialization of UAP-related questions in political debates, as seen
in previous exchanges, only serves to undermine public trust in elected
officials. When candidates dismiss questions or respond with derision,
they signal an unwillingness to seriously address voters' concerns. Such
attitudes impede productive discourse and contribute to an environment
of skepticism and disenchantment with the political process.
Implications of nondisclosure for national security
Maintaining
the status quo of secrecy surrounding UAPs has tangible national
security implications. Without public disclosure and informed discourse
about the nature of UAPs, strategizing a comprehensive defense or
understanding potential technological advances remains a challenge. A
commitment to transparency and declassification of relevant documents
could pave the way for greater preparedness and a safer nation.
Potential legislation and presidential
The
push for disclosure of UAPs has made its way into the halls of
Congress, prompting legislative proposals to force the release of
classified documents. Such legislation, if passed, would not only mark a
significant step toward government transparency but would also redefine
presidential authority regarding national security secrets. The passage
of these bills could serve as a catalyst for change, forcing future
administrations to prioritize openness and truth in their governance.
Ultimately,
the conversation surrounding UAP disclosure in the 2024 presidential
election intersects with broader issues of government transparency,
national security, and public trust. As candidates outline their
positions on this issue, their answers will likely reflect their broader
vision for America’s future. The time has come to reevaluate the layers
of secrecy that have long obscured the truth about UAPs, calling for a
new era of openness and accountability in American politics. In the
meantime, the mediators of political debates on TV are starting to ask
increasingly slippery questions to the candidates in the running who
will necessarily have to read up on the subject, as trying to evade
these questions is equivalent to telling the voters: if I am elected I
will continue with the old politics of government cover-ups, and that
could mean the difference between not getting elected and getting
elected.
Oliviero Mannucci
Source: Medium
EBE
& UAP Consultant for space and military organizations, film and TV
technician, amateur astronomer from 1975, science communicator, blogger
& more