NASA Saving Curiosity Rover MASTCAM Images At Only 70% Quality??

If anyone can answer why we only get to see 70 percent of quality of the original images I would love to hear it! I have always loved the MAHLI images when enhancing them and now I understand why. The 25 extra percent between 70 and 95 percent makes a major difference when you only have around 1000 X 1000 original pixels to work with! I would like to see all images that are labeled RAW IMAGES be an actual RAW IMAGE that has not had any of the quality cut in any shape or form. Maybe I am wrong here or making a big deal out of nothing but just a little FYI and something to take a look at! The http://www.fotoforensics.com is a neat website for a lot of uses!

Analysis of Image In Video: http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php...

Please LIKE, COMMENT, & SHARE on FACEBOOK, TWITTER & THE REST :) Much love to you all! "I see what I see, You see what you see.." - Me

UFO photo's you took? NASA photo's from Mars? Anything you have I am willing to take a look at!

Request that I review a picture or send me a video tip by emailing me at will@willfarrar.net and sending me what you have along with the links! Also check me out online at:
http://www.whatsupinthesky.com - Anomaly Website
http://www.willfarrar.net - Personal Website
http://www.facebook.com/willfarrar - My Facebook Page
http://www.mikeejonesmemorial.com - Scholarship for Music
http://www.youtube.com/WhatsUpInTheSky37 - My Channel
http://www.facebook.com/energyfield - Energy Field Information Network (WhatsUpInTheSky)